<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Chessedelic.com</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.chessedelic.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.chessedelic.com</link>
	<description>Your Voice In Chess</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 17:15:23 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Chess News #40: Carlsen&#8217;s Performance In Nanjing 2009 by Todd</title>
		<link>http://www.chessedelic.com/2009/10/13/chess-news-40-carlsens-performance-in-nanjing-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-797</link>
		<dc:creator>Todd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 17:26:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chessedelic.com/?p=471#comment-797</guid>
		<description>Great Video and website, very helpful.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great Video and website, very helpful.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Chess News #40: Carlsen&#8217;s Performance In Nanjing 2009 by Luke Harris</title>
		<link>http://www.chessedelic.com/2009/10/13/chess-news-40-carlsens-performance-in-nanjing-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-750</link>
		<dc:creator>Luke Harris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2010 19:29:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chessedelic.com/?p=471#comment-750</guid>
		<description>A knight on the rim is dim
A knight in the corner is forlorner</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A knight on the rim is dim<br />
A knight in the corner is forlorner</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on How To Study Chess by Leonard</title>
		<link>http://www.chessedelic.com/2008/08/09/how-to-study-chess/comment-page-1/#comment-749</link>
		<dc:creator>Leonard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jan 2010 21:15:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chessedelic.com/?p=156#comment-749</guid>
		<description>Hello.
I just wanted to post what I do and see if it helps anyone else.

I'm 15. My rating is not too high, but I'm not worried about that. I am trying to learn more rather than win. I only practice 1 train/study 1 hour a day because there are many other things I do. 

I divide that hour into 4 stages. 

13 Minutes= Tactics
For tactics I am studying "Winning Chess" by Irving Chernev and Fred Reifield. I study it in this fashion: 

1. I recreate the position on the board shown in the diagram.
2. I follow along what Chernev says and try to understand the concept. 
3. I memorize the position of all the pieces. 
4. I take all pieces of the board off.
5. I visualize all the pieces where they should be.
6. I recreate the position from memory 
7. I state the concept without the book.

Note: As I recreate the position from memory I say out loud what piece and what square I'm putting it on. Since "Winning Chess" was written using descriptive notation I use descriptive notation instead of algebraic.
Also before I begin each new session I review what concept and position I memorized last time. 

13 Minutes= Endgame Study
I found out that studying the endgame is very important so I am focusing on this more than on openings. I use Jeremy Silman's "Complete Endgame Course".

1. I set the pieces shown in diagram on the board.
2. I try to understand the concept he says while moving my pieces.
3. After I have studied it I try to recreate a different position that could hold the same principles.

12 Minutes= Actual games
I study actual games. For this right now I am using the illustrative games in the back of "Winning Chess", but I have used others in the past.

1. I try to understand why the person would move his piece, and If I can't I just go on.
That is pretty much all I do with the games.

Note: Trying to understand why he moved the piece involves trying to find the underlying concept.

12 Minutes= Blindfold training/visualization
During this time I take all the pieces away and merely "visualize".

1. I just started this: I concentrate on memorizing specific groups of squares. I memorized a1, a2, b1, b2. Then I try to picture that group in my mind. The next week I pictured the other corner: g1, g2, h1, h2. Right now I can picture only those groups without a board. 

2. I picture (with a board) the different pieces moving. I picture some of the moves the d pawn could make (not all of the moves). Then I picture the moves that the king could make, until I have done that with one of each piece (one pawn, one knight...). I plan to begin picturing 2 pieces at the same time and then progressively move upward.

3. I re-read the tactics book and try to picture the board and pieces in my mind. 

Generally: I play chess with my dad once in a while. We take turns deciding who gets which pieces. Every other week we switch pieces (one week he will play black all the days in that week, next week he will have to play white). This has to do with the above in that:

1. If it is my turn to play white all my studies around white: 

   a. In tactics the diagrams I do will be from white's point of view.
   b. In endgame they will be the winning pieces on the board.
   c. In games they will be on the bottom.
   d. In visualization all the pieces are visualized as white, and they are visualized in the bottom.


2. If it is my turn to play black my studies center around black.

   a. Most diagrams (all diagrams I have seen) seem to have white on the bottom. So I "invert" the pieces. I try to recreate the equivalent of the position from black's point of view. This means that the pieces will change squares, the king will probably be on the opposite side, etc. 
   b. So in tactics: I recreate position from black's point of view.
   c. In endgame the winning pieces are black and the squares have to be the "equivalent" of where the white pieces were.
   c. In games black plays the bottom.
   d. In visualization the pieces visualized are black, and he takes the bottom of the board.

Also I play one correspondence chess game at a time (usually with 3 days move limit). I take some time each day to ask myself what is the correct move and on the final day I make my move. 

I used to play live chess but then I decided I should probably spend my time more profitably this way (especially after some of the blunders I made). I think I will now limit myself to one live chess game of 1 hour every week.

That is all. If in anyway you see I could progress or learn differently please tell me. If it helped you. Awesome. If not. Patience huh?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello.<br />
I just wanted to post what I do and see if it helps anyone else.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m 15. My rating is not too high, but I&#8217;m not worried about that. I am trying to learn more rather than win. I only practice 1 train/study 1 hour a day because there are many other things I do. </p>
<p>I divide that hour into 4 stages. </p>
<p>13 Minutes= Tactics<br />
For tactics I am studying &#8220;Winning Chess&#8221; by Irving Chernev and Fred Reifield. I study it in this fashion: </p>
<p>1. I recreate the position on the board shown in the diagram.<br />
2. I follow along what Chernev says and try to understand the concept.<br />
3. I memorize the position of all the pieces.<br />
4. I take all pieces of the board off.<br />
5. I visualize all the pieces where they should be.<br />
6. I recreate the position from memory<br />
7. I state the concept without the book.</p>
<p>Note: As I recreate the position from memory I say out loud what piece and what square I&#8217;m putting it on. Since &#8220;Winning Chess&#8221; was written using descriptive notation I use descriptive notation instead of algebraic.<br />
Also before I begin each new session I review what concept and position I memorized last time. </p>
<p>13 Minutes= Endgame Study<br />
I found out that studying the endgame is very important so I am focusing on this more than on openings. I use Jeremy Silman&#8217;s &#8220;Complete Endgame Course&#8221;.</p>
<p>1. I set the pieces shown in diagram on the board.<br />
2. I try to understand the concept he says while moving my pieces.<br />
3. After I have studied it I try to recreate a different position that could hold the same principles.</p>
<p>12 Minutes= Actual games<br />
I study actual games. For this right now I am using the illustrative games in the back of &#8220;Winning Chess&#8221;, but I have used others in the past.</p>
<p>1. I try to understand why the person would move his piece, and If I can&#8217;t I just go on.<br />
That is pretty much all I do with the games.</p>
<p>Note: Trying to understand why he moved the piece involves trying to find the underlying concept.</p>
<p>12 Minutes= Blindfold training/visualization<br />
During this time I take all the pieces away and merely &#8220;visualize&#8221;.</p>
<p>1. I just started this: I concentrate on memorizing specific groups of squares. I memorized a1, a2, b1, b2. Then I try to picture that group in my mind. The next week I pictured the other corner: g1, g2, h1, h2. Right now I can picture only those groups without a board. </p>
<p>2. I picture (with a board) the different pieces moving. I picture some of the moves the d pawn could make (not all of the moves). Then I picture the moves that the king could make, until I have done that with one of each piece (one pawn, one knight&#8230;). I plan to begin picturing 2 pieces at the same time and then progressively move upward.</p>
<p>3. I re-read the tactics book and try to picture the board and pieces in my mind. </p>
<p>Generally: I play chess with my dad once in a while. We take turns deciding who gets which pieces. Every other week we switch pieces (one week he will play black all the days in that week, next week he will have to play white). This has to do with the above in that:</p>
<p>1. If it is my turn to play white all my studies around white: </p>
<p>   a. In tactics the diagrams I do will be from white&#8217;s point of view.<br />
   b. In endgame they will be the winning pieces on the board.<br />
   c. In games they will be on the bottom.<br />
   d. In visualization all the pieces are visualized as white, and they are visualized in the bottom.</p>
<p>2. If it is my turn to play black my studies center around black.</p>
<p>   a. Most diagrams (all diagrams I have seen) seem to have white on the bottom. So I &#8220;invert&#8221; the pieces. I try to recreate the equivalent of the position from black&#8217;s point of view. This means that the pieces will change squares, the king will probably be on the opposite side, etc.<br />
   b. So in tactics: I recreate position from black&#8217;s point of view.<br />
   c. In endgame the winning pieces are black and the squares have to be the &#8220;equivalent&#8221; of where the white pieces were.<br />
   c. In games black plays the bottom.<br />
   d. In visualization the pieces visualized are black, and he takes the bottom of the board.</p>
<p>Also I play one correspondence chess game at a time (usually with 3 days move limit). I take some time each day to ask myself what is the correct move and on the final day I make my move. </p>
<p>I used to play live chess but then I decided I should probably spend my time more profitably this way (especially after some of the blunders I made). I think I will now limit myself to one live chess game of 1 hour every week.</p>
<p>That is all. If in anyway you see I could progress or learn differently please tell me. If it helped you. Awesome. If not. Patience huh?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Chess News #40: Carlsen&#8217;s Performance In Nanjing 2009 by mario</title>
		<link>http://www.chessedelic.com/2009/10/13/chess-news-40-carlsens-performance-in-nanjing-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-746</link>
		<dc:creator>mario</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 17:21:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chessedelic.com/?p=471#comment-746</guid>
		<description>great videos, great analysis</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>great videos, great analysis</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Chess News #39: Karpov - Kasparov, Video Analysis Rapid Match Valencia 2009 by SonofPearl</title>
		<link>http://www.chessedelic.com/2009/09/24/chess-news-39-karpov-kasparov-video-analysis-rapid-match-valencia-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-716</link>
		<dc:creator>SonofPearl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Sep 2009 14:34:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chessedelic.com/?p=462#comment-716</guid>
		<description>Hi Waldemar.

I don't see any video at all at the moment - not even a placeholder.  I hope you get the glitch fixed asap - I'm really looking forward to your analysis of the games! :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Waldemar.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t see any video at all at the moment - not even a placeholder.  I hope you get the glitch fixed asap - I&#8217;m really looking forward to your analysis of the games! :-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on [video] The World&#8217;s Most Famous Chess Combinations #12: Anand - Lautier, Biel 1997 by Ronald Diaz</title>
		<link>http://www.chessedelic.com/2009/05/11/video-the-worlds-most-famous-chess-combinations-12-anand-lautier-biel-1997/comment-page-1/#comment-710</link>
		<dc:creator>Ronald Diaz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Aug 2009 20:27:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chessedelic.com/?p=234#comment-710</guid>
		<description>Waldemar, I enjoy and learn something new in your instructional chess videos. I like how you turn complicated position into simple ones for us amateurs to understand. Great job !!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Waldemar, I enjoy and learn something new in your instructional chess videos. I like how you turn complicated position into simple ones for us amateurs to understand. Great job !!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on [video] The World&#8217;s Most Famous Chess Combinations #10: Larsen - Spassky, Belgrade 1970 by Ronald Diaz</title>
		<link>http://www.chessedelic.com/2009/02/07/video-the-worlds-most-famous-chess-combinations-10larsen-spassky-belgrade-1970/comment-page-1/#comment-708</link>
		<dc:creator>Ronald Diaz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Aug 2009 04:05:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chessedelic.com/?p=209#comment-708</guid>
		<description>A great game for Spassky. I love your enthusiasm in how you break down a chess position for both sides and why some of the tactical shots work and others not. Please keep bringing us some more. I enjoy your videos. Thank you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A great game for Spassky. I love your enthusiasm in how you break down a chess position for both sides and why some of the tactical shots work and others not. Please keep bringing us some more. I enjoy your videos. Thank you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on [video] The World&#8217;s Most Famous Chess Combinations #5: Adams v. Torre by Ronald Diaz</title>
		<link>http://www.chessedelic.com/2008/06/12/the-worlds-most-famous-chess-combinations-5-adams-v-torre/comment-page-1/#comment-707</link>
		<dc:creator>Ronald Diaz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Aug 2009 02:20:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chessedelic.com/?p=88#comment-707</guid>
		<description>Thank you Waldemar this is a trully an amazing game. I have never seen a Queen chase like this before. Awesome !!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you Waldemar this is a trully an amazing game. I have never seen a Queen chase like this before. Awesome !!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on [video] The World&#8217;s Most Famous Chess Combinations #2: Lasker v. Bauer by Ronald Diaz</title>
		<link>http://www.chessedelic.com/2008/05/22/the-worlds-most-famous-chess-combinations-2-lasker-v-bauer/comment-page-1/#comment-706</link>
		<dc:creator>Ronald Diaz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Aug 2009 01:35:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chessedelic.com/2008/05/22/the-worlds-most-famous-chess-combinations-2-lasker-v-bauer/#comment-706</guid>
		<description>This Lasker's game is one of the reason why I switch my main opening repertoire to the Colle Zukertort AKA Rubinstein attack. Great game indeed !!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This Lasker&#8217;s game is one of the reason why I switch my main opening repertoire to the Colle Zukertort AKA Rubinstein attack. Great game indeed !!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Interview With IGM Karel Van Der Weide by Renzo</title>
		<link>http://www.chessedelic.com/2009/07/26/interview-with-igm-karel-van-der-weide/comment-page-1/#comment-704</link>
		<dc:creator>Renzo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2009 18:43:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chessedelic.com/?p=415#comment-704</guid>
		<description>interesting, this vanderweideboy - can he write my biography?
he says interesting things about the crazy life of a chess player.
The comparison of chess with sex: interesting.
One thing I missed: influence of his father: the famous Piet van der Weide.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>interesting, this vanderweideboy - can he write my biography?<br />
he says interesting things about the crazy life of a chess player.<br />
The comparison of chess with sex: interesting.<br />
One thing I missed: influence of his father: the famous Piet van der Weide.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
