In this article I want to introduce a training method for improving your chess thinking. To do this properly it is important that you do this rather shortly after you have played the game. That way you have the best recollection of the thoughts and feelings you had during the game, be it general, in reaction to your opponents moves or not.
Below I give you an example of how I conducted this experiment once myself. In the first column I have written down white’s move (in this case my opponent), in the second column I have written down Black’s (my own) moves, in the third column I have described all the thoughts and feelings I had before or in reaction to a specific move (these descriptions are in the same rows as the move that they involve) and in the fourth column I have written down what I felt was right or wrong about these thoughts and feelings from a perspective of objectivity and practicality.
It made me realize that I quite often tell myself stories (narratives) and try and fool myself into believing unjust realities, especially when playing lower rated opponents. Try it yourself, look for your thoughts, correct them in as far as they are emotionally colored, be honest and see where your weaknesses lie!
If you are willing to share any thoughts or experiences on the matter just leave your comments.
Cheers,
Waldemar
External club match Baarn I – Amersfoort 3
Baarn, 28 april 2006
|
|
White: Flohr |
Black: Moes |
Thoughts & Feelings |
Correction |
|
1 |
d2-d4 |
|
Hmm, what opening shall I play? Something |
|
|
|
|
Ng8-f6 |
Indian! |
|
|
2 |
Bc1-g5 |
|
He must be an expert on the Tromp. |
Probably he has some experience with the |
|
|
|
e7-e6 |
According to Rowson the best method, also |
But what are my own experiences with this |
|
3 |
e2-e3 |
|
Hm, pity. After e4 I would have gained |
So I should know what is the best |
|
|
|
Bf8-e7 |
I have seen something with c5 and Pf6-d5. |
Constructed knowledge, but not bad. Possibly |
|
4 |
Bf1-d3 |
|
very solid |
|
|
|
|
b7-b6 |
On we go |
|
|
5 |
Nb1-d2 |
|
covers e4 |
|
|
|
|
Bc8-b7 |
I felt afraid of Bd3-b5+ and checked that |
I corrected that and the fear had no |
|
6 |
Ng1-f3 |
|
Of course no e4 |
That move is not bad by the way |
|
|
|
d7-d6 |
I would like some more flexibility and |
Whoever says ‘A’ does not need to say ‘B’: |
|
7 |
Qd1-e2 |
|
Ha, he wants to exchange bishops with Ba6, |
Narrative! It may indeed lose time, but it could be time well invested |
|
|
|
Nb8-d7 |
On Ba6 I answer Qc8(!) |
See previous comment, I was still |
|
8 |
c2-c3 |
|
You see, he is not playing Ba6 |
Maybe rejecting the move, but not the |
|
|
|
Nf6-d5 |
I don’t want to castle and give him an |
If after …0-0 White would castle |
|
9 |
Bg5xe7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Qd8xe7 |
|
|
|
10 |
Bd3-a6 |
|
Hm, he hasn’t castled yet and now I can |
The fact that White has not castled yet |
|
|
|
Bc8xa6 |
|
|
|
11 |
Qe2xa6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0-0 |
|
|
|
12 |
e3-e4 |
|
Hm, he still doesn’t castle! |
But there is also no objective line in |
|
|
|
Nd5-f4 |
Now after 0-0 I can play e5 |
|
|
13 |
g2-g3 |
|
He is weakening himself? I like the look |
Yes, but it is only a slight weakening. |
|
|
|
Nf4-h3 |
This stops him from castling! |
Yes, but the knight is forced to retreat |
|
14 |
Qa6-f1 |
|
Now his Queen blocks his castling. When |
Yes, but that is only temporary and what |
|
|
|
Nh3-g5 |
|
|
|
15 |
Nf3xg5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Qe7xg5 |
|
|
|
16 |
f2-f4 |
|
Now he is even more vulnerable in the |
That may be so, but there are two sides |
|
|
|
Qg5-g6 |
Hm, pity, Qa5 is not possible because of |
Instead of b5 I can play Rac8! And after |
|
17 |
Qf1-e2 |
|
I thought Qf3 was better. |
But it isn’t. |
|
|
|
c7-c5 |
I want my fair share of the center. I |
Good. |
|
18 |
0-0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nd7-f6 |
The knight has more Scope here. It |
Good! SMALL PLAN. Fritz thinks |
|
19 |
Ra1-e1 |
|
Hm, if the c-file opens up this rook may |
Possible, but maybe it is not only the |
|
|
|
c5xd4 |
|
|
|
20 |
c5xd4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
h7-h5? |
Now I can execute my small plan. |
Timing is wrong. I’m not taking into |
|
21 |
Kg1-h1 |
|
Huh, isn’t Kg2 better? |
What kind of storytelling is this?! |
|
|
|
Ra8-c8 |
I thought long about the differences |
A more practical approach was perhaps |
|
22 |
Re1-c1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
d6-d5 |
If e4-e5 then I have square f5 and after |
|
|
23 |
e4xd5 |
|
Huh, e4-e5 seemed better. |
But then Ng4 is good. |
|
|
|
e6xd5!? |
Suddenly I started thinking a long time |
Even though the text move might be good |
|
24 |
Nd2-f3 |
|
Now I can pin. |
|
|
|
|
Qg6-g4 |
|
|
|
25 |
Nf3-g1 |
|
Passive |
|
|
|
|
Rf8-e8 |
Calculating this cost me some energy and |
The position is more difficult to handle |
|
26 |
Qe2-g2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nf6-e4 |
|
Beauty idealism. h4 offered more chances. |
|
27 |
Qg2-f3 |
|
I don’t want to exchange queens. Mine is |
In principle correct. Especially |
|
|
|
Qg4-f5 |
|
|
|
28 |
Qf3-d1? |
|
Quickly, I have to move. |
I want to move. |
|
|
|
g7-g6? |
Profylactic move. |
I miss the decisive Rxc1 Qxc1 en Rc8. MISSED |
|
29 |
Kh1-g2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Qf5-f6 |
|
|
|
30 |
Ng1-f3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kg8-g7 |
Hm, another 10 moves in 2 minutes, that’s |
Seems wise. |
|
|
½ |
½ |
|
|






September 28th, 2008 at 10:59 am
Very interesting actually…this is very important.
well I ask my self some questions:
1. which pieces are menaced?
2. which are the pieces which are not defended after this?
3. which are his plans?
4. which could be my plan?
Do you have some other to advise me? ;) bye
September 28th, 2008 at 11:58 am
Hi Mario,
Thanks for the comment!
These are all useful questions to ask yourself.
You could start with putting the first question more general:
“What is my opponent threatening?”
That way you cover more possibilities than just pieces that are undefended.
Cheers!
Walemar